Hello James Smart, The patch 5021267af132: "scsi: lpfc: Adding ability to reset chip via pci bus reset" from Dec 13, 2018, leads to the following static checker warning: drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c:1322 lpfc_reset_pci_bus() warn: passing bogus address: '&(phba->pcidev)->dev' val = 176 drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c 1309 static int 1310 lpfc_reset_pci_bus(struct lpfc_hba *phba) 1311 { 1312 struct pci_dev *pdev = phba->pcidev; ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pdev and phba->pcidev are the same. 1313 struct Scsi_Host *shost = NULL; 1314 struct lpfc_hba *phba_other = NULL; 1315 struct pci_dev *ptr = NULL; 1316 int res; 1317 1318 if (phba->cfg_enable_hba_reset != 2) 1319 return -ENOTSUPP; 1320 1321 if (!pdev) { ^^^^^ They are both NULL. 1322 lpfc_printf_log(phba, KERN_INFO, LOG_INIT, "8345 pdev NULL!\n"); This passes "&(phba->pcidev)->dev" which is "(void *)176" to __dev_printk() which dereferences it. Can it really be NULL? 1323 return -ENODEV; 1324 } 1325 1326 res = lpfc_check_pci_resettable(phba); 1327 if (res) 1328 return res; regards, dan carpenter