Re: [PATCH 10/24] scsi: allocate separate queue for reserved commands

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 07:14:14PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> Is this really required? I would think that a non-zero value for 
>> shost->nr_reserved_cmds means the same thing in practice.
>> ;
> My implementation actually allows for per-device reserved tags (eg for 
> virtio). But some drivers require to use internal commands prior to any 
> device setup, so they have to use a separate reserved command queue just to 
> be able to allocate tags.

Why would virtio-scsi need per-device reserved commands?  It currently uses
a global mempool to allocate the reset commands.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux