On 3/21/19 2:39 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On Wed, 2019-03-20 at 20:35 -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: >> Bart, >> >>> You are right of course. The reason I would like to inline that >>> function is because it was essential in the past to have that code as >>> a separate function but after patch 1/2 inlining that function makes >>> sd_probe() easier to read. Martin, do you want me to resubmit this >>> patch series with an updated commit message or do you rather prefer to >>> update the commit message yourself? >> >> Just mail me a reworded blurb. > > Hi Martin, > > How about the following: > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > Make sd_probe() easier to read by inlining sd_probe_part2(). This patch > does not change any functionality. > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > Thanks, > > Bart. > Given the updated blurb: Reviewed-by: Lee Duncan <lduncan@xxxxxxxx>
