On Wed, 2019-03-20 at 20:35 -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: +AD4 Bart, +AD4 +AD4 +AD4 You are right of course. The reason I would like to inline that +AD4 +AD4 function is because it was essential in the past to have that code as +AD4 +AD4 a separate function but after patch 1/2 inlining that function makes +AD4 +AD4 sd+AF8-probe() easier to read. Martin, do you want me to resubmit this +AD4 +AD4 patch series with an updated commit message or do you rather prefer to +AD4 +AD4 update the commit message yourself? +AD4 +AD4 Just mail me a reworded blurb. Hi Martin, How about the following: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Make sd+AF8-probe() easier to read by inlining sd+AF8-probe+AF8-part2(). This patch does not change any functionality. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks, Bart.
