Re: [PATCH 38/41] scsi: sym53c8xx_2: sym_hipd: mark expected switch fall-throughs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

Friendly ping:

Who can ack or review this patch, please?

Thanks
--
Gustavo

On 11/27/18 10:34 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114996 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_hipd.c | 2 ++
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_hipd.c b/drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_hipd.c
index 0a2a54517b15..054fb0599263 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_hipd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_hipd.c
@@ -3072,6 +3072,7 @@ static void sym_sir_bad_scsi_status(struct sym_hcb *np, int num, struct sym_ccb
  			sym_print_addr(cp->cmd, "%s\n",
  			        s_status == S_BUSY ? "BUSY" : "QUEUE FULL\n");
  		}
+		/* fall through */
  	default:	/* S_INT, S_INT_COND_MET, S_CONFLICT */
  		sym_complete_error (np, cp);
  		break;
@@ -4632,6 +4633,7 @@ static void sym_int_sir(struct sym_hcb *np)
  	 *  Negotiation failed.
  	 *  Target does not want answer message.
  	 */
+	/* fall through */
  	case SIR_NEGO_PROTO:
  		sym_nego_default(np, tp, cp);
  		goto out;




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux