Hi,
Friendly ping:
Who can ack or review this patch, please?
Thanks
--
Gustavo
On 11/27/18 10:34 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114996 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_hipd.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_hipd.c b/drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_hipd.c
index 0a2a54517b15..054fb0599263 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_hipd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_hipd.c
@@ -3072,6 +3072,7 @@ static void sym_sir_bad_scsi_status(struct sym_hcb *np, int num, struct sym_ccb
sym_print_addr(cp->cmd, "%s\n",
s_status == S_BUSY ? "BUSY" : "QUEUE FULL\n");
}
+ /* fall through */
default: /* S_INT, S_INT_COND_MET, S_CONFLICT */
sym_complete_error (np, cp);
break;
@@ -4632,6 +4633,7 @@ static void sym_int_sir(struct sym_hcb *np)
* Negotiation failed.
* Target does not want answer message.
*/
+ /* fall through */
case SIR_NEGO_PROTO:
sym_nego_default(np, tp, cp);
goto out;
