Hi,
Friendly ping:
Who can ack or review this patch, please?
Thanks
--
Gustavo
On 11/27/18 10:30 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that, in this particular case, a dash is added as a token in
order to separate the "fall through" annotations from the rest of
the comment on the same line, which is what GCC is expecting to find.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/scsi/isci/remote_device.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/isci/remote_device.c b/drivers/scsi/isci/remote_device.c
index cc51f38b116d..9d29edb9f590 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/isci/remote_device.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/isci/remote_device.c
@@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ static void isci_remote_device_not_ready(struct isci_host *ihost,
/* Kill all outstanding requests for the device. */
sci_remote_device_terminate_requests(idev);
- /* Fall through into the default case... */
+ /* Fall through - into the default case... */
default:
clear_bit(IDEV_IO_READY, &idev->flags);
break;
@@ -593,7 +593,7 @@ enum sci_status sci_remote_device_event_handler(struct isci_remote_device *idev,
break;
}
- /* Else, fall through and treat as unhandled... */
+ /* fall through - and treat as unhandled... */
default:
dev_dbg(scirdev_to_dev(idev),
"%s: device: %p event code: %x: %s\n",
