[PATCH 18/41] scsi: isci: remote_device: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Notice that, in this particular case, a dash is added as a token in
order to separate the "fall through" annotations from the rest of
the comment on the same line, which is what GCC is expecting to find.

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/scsi/isci/remote_device.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/isci/remote_device.c b/drivers/scsi/isci/remote_device.c
index cc51f38b116d..9d29edb9f590 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/isci/remote_device.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/isci/remote_device.c
@@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ static void isci_remote_device_not_ready(struct isci_host *ihost,
 		/* Kill all outstanding requests for the device. */
 		sci_remote_device_terminate_requests(idev);
 
-		/* Fall through into the default case... */
+		/* Fall through - into the default case... */
 	default:
 		clear_bit(IDEV_IO_READY, &idev->flags);
 		break;
@@ -593,7 +593,7 @@ enum sci_status sci_remote_device_event_handler(struct isci_remote_device *idev,
 
 			break;
 		}
-	/* Else, fall through and treat as unhandled... */
+		/* fall through - and treat as unhandled... */
 	default:
 		dev_dbg(scirdev_to_dev(idev),
 			"%s: device: %p event code: %x: %s\n",
-- 
2.17.1




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux