Hi,
Friendly ping:
Who can ack or review this patch, please?
Thanks
--
Gustavo
On 11/27/18 10:31 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that, in this particular case, I replaced "Drop thru" with a
"fall through" annotation, which is what GCC is expecting to find.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114976 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114977 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c
index 6c2fb55d739b..1a61806739ff 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c
@@ -4645,9 +4645,11 @@ lpfc_check_sli_ndlp(struct lpfc_hba *phba,
case CMD_GEN_REQUEST64_CR:
if (iocb->context_un.ndlp == ndlp)
return 1;
+ /* fall through */
case CMD_ELS_REQUEST64_CR:
if (icmd->un.elsreq64.remoteID == ndlp->nlp_DID)
return 1;
+ /* fall through */
case CMD_XMIT_ELS_RSP64_CX:
if (iocb->context1 == (uint8_t *) ndlp)
return 1;
@@ -5791,7 +5793,7 @@ lpfc_disc_timeout_handler(struct lpfc_vport *vport)
case LPFC_LINK_UP:
lpfc_issue_clear_la(phba, vport);
- /* Drop thru */
+ /* fall through */
case LPFC_LINK_UNKNOWN:
case LPFC_WARM_START:
case LPFC_INIT_START:
