[PATCH 24/41] scsi: lpfc: lpfc_hbadisc: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Notice that, in this particular case, I replaced "Drop thru" with a
"fall through" annotation, which is what GCC is expecting to find.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114976 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114977 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c
index 6c2fb55d739b..1a61806739ff 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c
@@ -4645,9 +4645,11 @@ lpfc_check_sli_ndlp(struct lpfc_hba *phba,
 		case CMD_GEN_REQUEST64_CR:
 			if (iocb->context_un.ndlp == ndlp)
 				return 1;
+			/* fall through */
 		case CMD_ELS_REQUEST64_CR:
 			if (icmd->un.elsreq64.remoteID == ndlp->nlp_DID)
 				return 1;
+			/* fall through */
 		case CMD_XMIT_ELS_RSP64_CX:
 			if (iocb->context1 == (uint8_t *) ndlp)
 				return 1;
@@ -5791,7 +5793,7 @@ lpfc_disc_timeout_handler(struct lpfc_vport *vport)
 
 	case LPFC_LINK_UP:
 		lpfc_issue_clear_la(phba, vport);
-		/* Drop thru */
+		/* fall through */
 	case LPFC_LINK_UNKNOWN:
 	case LPFC_WARM_START:
 	case LPFC_INIT_START:
-- 
2.17.1




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux