Hi, Friendly ping: Who can ack or review this patch, please? Thanks -- Gustavo On 11/27/18 10:30 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that, in this particular case, a dash is added as a token in order to separate the "Fall through" annotations from the rest of the comment on the same line, which is what GCC is expecting to find. Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/scsi/isci/remote_node_context.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/isci/remote_node_context.c b/drivers/scsi/isci/remote_node_context.c index e3f2a5359d71..474a43460963 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/isci/remote_node_context.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/isci/remote_node_context.c @@ -601,9 +601,9 @@ enum sci_status sci_remote_node_context_suspend( __func__, sci_rnc); return SCI_FAILURE_INVALID_STATE; } - /* Fall through and handle like SCI_RNC_POSTING */ + /* Fall through - and handle like SCI_RNC_POSTING */ case SCI_RNC_RESUMING: - /* Fall through and handle like SCI_RNC_POSTING */ + /* Fall through - and handle like SCI_RNC_POSTING */ case SCI_RNC_POSTING: /* Set the destination state to AWAIT - this signals the * entry into the SCI_RNC_READY state that a suspension
