[PATCH 19/41] scsi: isci: remote_node_context: mark expected switch fall-throughs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Notice that, in this particular case, a dash is added as a token in
order to separate the "Fall through" annotations from the rest of
the comment on the same line, which is what GCC is expecting to find.

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/scsi/isci/remote_node_context.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/isci/remote_node_context.c b/drivers/scsi/isci/remote_node_context.c
index e3f2a5359d71..474a43460963 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/isci/remote_node_context.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/isci/remote_node_context.c
@@ -601,9 +601,9 @@ enum sci_status sci_remote_node_context_suspend(
 				 __func__, sci_rnc);
 			return SCI_FAILURE_INVALID_STATE;
 		}
-		/* Fall through and handle like SCI_RNC_POSTING */
+		/* Fall through - and handle like SCI_RNC_POSTING */
 	case SCI_RNC_RESUMING:
-		/* Fall through and handle like SCI_RNC_POSTING */
+		/* Fall through - and handle like SCI_RNC_POSTING */
 	case SCI_RNC_POSTING:
 		/* Set the destination state to AWAIT - this signals the
 		 * entry into the SCI_RNC_READY state that a suspension
-- 
2.17.1




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux