Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] target: add device vendor_id configfs attribute

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Bart,

On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 08:36:19 -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:

> Maybe I'm missing something, but why is zeroing of unused bytes in these functions
> necessary? Would the following be correct if all strings in struct t10_wwn would be
> '\0'-terminated?

Your patch looks good to me. Mind if I tack it on to the end of my
t10_wwn.vendor/model/revision[size+1] patchset, with your authorship?

Cheers, David



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux