On Fri, 2018-10-26 at 14:00 -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote: +AD4 On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 11:01 AM Bart Van Assche +ADw-bvanassche+AEA-acm.org+AD4 wrote: +AD4 +AD4 +AD4 +AD4 On Fri, 2018-10-26 at 10:54 -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote: +AD4 +AD4 +AD4 If creating one instance of this variable is a functional change, I +AD4 +AD4 +AD4 can't help but suspect the original code was wrong. But maybe Bart, +AD4 +AD4 +AD4 Boaz, or Christoph can clarify or have more thoughts on this? Looks +AD4 +AD4 +AD4 like Boaz added this header in commit de258bf5e638 (+ACIAWw-SCSI+AF0 libosd: +AD4 +AD4 +AD4 OSDv1 Headers+ACI). +AD4 +AD4 +AD4 +AD4 Hi Nick and Nathan, +AD4 +AD4 +AD4 +AD4 Had you noticed the following e-mail from early October: +AD4 +AD4 https://marc.info/?l+AD0-linux-kernel+ACY-m+AD0-153849955503249? +AD4 +AD4 From this subthread with Linus, removal of the exofs fs and scsi osd +AD4 code would be a user visible change and is not an option. See: +AD4 https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/27/3 +AD4 https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/27/44 Hi Nick, Linus wrote that removing a filesystem is considered a userspace breakage if a user notices. The key part is +ACI-if a user notices+ACI. Who are the exofs users? Bart.
