On Tue, 2018-04-10 at 15:48 +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 09:35:21PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > > > > Johannes, > > > > > I did start a series [1] for this but than got distracted by more urgent > > > things. I can pick it up again I think. > > > > > > [1] > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jth/linux.git/log/?h=iscsi_DID_REQUEUE > > > > Definitely a step in the right direction. > > Does anyone object getting rid of the Scsi_Cmnd typedef while I'm at > it? > > This would ease my refactoring a lot, asI don't have to teach > coccinelle yet another case that multiplies the rules. I'm in favor of the removal. But maybe there is something I'm overlooking and that means that the typedef should not be removed? Bart.
