On 03/28/18 08:14, bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 2018-03-28 15:05:41 [+0000], Bart Van Assche wrote:
The names of the two functions touched by patch 1/2 start with a double
underscore. That by itself is already a hint that these should be called with
a lock held (I know that this is not a universal convention in the Linux
kernel). I'm fine either way - either with patch 1/2 as posted or patch 1/2
with the above comment added.
Okay. In that case let me update 1/2.
But 2/2 with the comment as Steven suggested is still a no no for you?
Although I'm not enthusiast about patch 2/2, if others agree with that
patch I'm fine with that patch being sent upstream.
Thanks,
Bart.
