Any comment for this patch.
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 10:09 PM, Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Use dma_pool_zalloc() instead of dma_pool_alloc + memset
>
> Signed-off-by: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/aic94xx/aic94xx_hwi.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/aic94xx/aic94xx_hwi.c b/drivers/scsi/aic94xx/aic94xx_hwi.c
> index 2dbc833..1b13133 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/aic94xx/aic94xx_hwi.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/aic94xx/aic94xx_hwi.c
> @@ -1055,14 +1055,13 @@ static struct asd_ascb *asd_ascb_alloc(struct asd_ha_struct *asd_ha,
>
> if (ascb) {
> ascb->dma_scb.size = sizeof(struct scb);
> - ascb->dma_scb.vaddr = dma_pool_alloc(asd_ha->scb_pool,
> + ascb->dma_scb.vaddr = dma_pool_zalloc(asd_ha->scb_pool,
> gfp_flags,
> &ascb->dma_scb.dma_handle);
> if (!ascb->dma_scb.vaddr) {
> kmem_cache_free(asd_ascb_cache, ascb);
> return NULL;
> }
> - memset(ascb->dma_scb.vaddr, 0, sizeof(struct scb));
> asd_init_ascb(asd_ha, ascb);
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&seq->tc_index_lock, flags);
> --
> 1.9.1
>
