Re: [PATCH] Improve ZBC/ZAC error handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tejun,

> Except for the nit on the last patch, ata part looks good to me.
> Martin, how do you wanna route the SCSI part?

I want to route it to /dev/null on the grounds of being a BLATANT
LAYERING VIOLATION (cue dramatic sound effect).

scsi_error.c is SPC territory, we really shouldn't wedge any ZBC/SBC
stuff in there. Nor should we call into this file from libata. If
there's a ZAC/ZBC SAT retry deficiency, let's address that instead of
working around it.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux