Re: [PATCH] Improve ZBC/ZAC error handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 04:40:18AM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> This series introduces changes to scsi and libata error handling for ZBC and ZAC
> devices.
> 
> The first patch moves ZBC specific error handling in sd_zbc_complete() to a
> generic scsi error function that can be used also in libata (second patch). The
> goal of this change is to limit retries for commands that are identify as not
> worth retrying (know failure condition) for both scsi/ZBC and libata/ZAC.
> Without these two patches, only ZBC behaves nicely (commands that are known to
> fail are retried in the ZAC case).
> 
> The following 2 snmall patches are simple fixes.
> 
> The last 2 pacthes are improvements in libata error handling verbosity.
> 
> Damien Le Moal (6):
>   scsi: Introduce scsi_zbc_noretry_cmd()
>   libata: Use scsi_zbc_noretry_cmd() for ZAC devices
>   libata: Fix comment typo in ata_eh_analyze_tf()
>   libata: Fix ata_err_string()
>   libata: Honor RQF_QUIET flag
>   libata: Be quiet when asked to

Except for the nit on the last patch, ata part looks good to me.
Martin, how do you wanna route the SCSI part?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux