> On Feb 22, 2018, at 10:28 PM, Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 23/02/18 09:22, Uma Krishnan wrote: >> Add initial infrastructure to support a new cxlflash transport, OpenCXL. >> Claim a dependency on OpenCXL (OCXL) and add a new file, ocxl_hw.c, which >> will host the backend routines that are specific to OpenCXL. >> Signed-off-by: Uma Krishnan <ukrishn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Is it necessary to depend on OCXL in all cases? IMHO it should be possible to build a cxl-only version without ocxl, though I don't feel very strongly on this. I thought through this and did not feel it is necessary to distinguish right now. I will look at adding this in the future. Thanks Andrew !
