Re: [PATCH 04/38] cxlflash: Introduce OpenCXL backend

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 23/02/18 09:22, Uma Krishnan wrote:
Add initial infrastructure to support a new cxlflash transport, OpenCXL.

Claim a dependency on OpenCXL (OCXL) and add a new file, ocxl_hw.c, which
will host the backend routines that are specific to OpenCXL.

Signed-off-by: Uma Krishnan <ukrishn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Is it necessary to depend on OCXL in all cases? IMHO it should be possible to build a cxl-only version without ocxl, though I don't feel very strongly on this.

--
Andrew Donnellan              OzLabs, ADL Canberra
andrew.donnellan@xxxxxxxxxxx  IBM Australia Limited




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux