On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 01:58 -0700, Luben Tuikov wrote: > The sequencer response is correct but incomplete. The interpretation > is a bad compromize between SSP and STP. > > TF_TMF_NO_CTX should be interpreted as TMF_RESP_FUNC_ESUPP to get > "best of both worlds", and then upper layers would do the proper > thing depending on the protocol. OK ... I can do that easily; that should cause the error handler to try with a bigger hammer. The next problem is that this actual issue is occurring in sas_execute_task() which takes no further action if an abort fails. I can easily wire in a next level ... would you recommend CLEAR_TASK_SET, or move straight on to LOGICAL_UNIT_RESET? James > Of course your version of my code and my version of my code differ > somewhat. > > The fix in the sequencer is messy as is the fix in software. > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
