On Sat, 2017-09-30 at 11:52 +0530, Alim Akhtar wrote: > Currently UFS HCI uses UFS_BIT() macro to get various bit > position for the hardware registers status bits. Which makes > code longer instead of shorter. This macro does not improve > code readability as well. > Lets re-write these macro definition with the actual bit position. Can the three patches in this series be combined into a single patch? > -#define UFS_BIT(x) (1L << (x)) > [ ... ] > +#define UFS_BIT(x) (1L << (x)) If you want to keep the three patches separate, please make sure that this patch does not modify the UFS_BIT() definition. Please also fix the spelling of the title of this patch (marco -> macro). Thanks, Bart.
