Re: [PATCH] sd: preserve sysfs updates to max_sectors_kb

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Martin,

> Could you please explain why you think Don's patch is wrong? User
> settings being discarded because of a BLKRRPART ioctl violates the
> principle of least surprise. With Don's patch, that won't happen any
> more. If hardware limits change, whether they increase or decrease, the
> patch will also do the Right Thing, AFAICS. Increasing hw limits will
> not automatically increase the sw limit, but IMO that's actually
> expected.

I have been mulling over this for a while.

I suggest the following...

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux