Hello Martin, On Tue, 2017-08-29 at 21:24 -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > I looked at this for a bit last week to see if I could come up with > an > elegant way to accommodate values overridden in sysfs and at the same > time honor hardware limits changing. However, it quickly gets messy > since some parameters are under the request_queue and some are > scsi_disk > specific. So that involves having override flags several places. Plus > there also the whole re-stacking debacle. > > So I think I prefer udev for this. Could you please explain why you think Don's patch is wrong? User settings being discarded because of a BLKRRPART ioctl violates the principle of least surprise. With Don's patch, that won't happen any more. If hardware limits change, whether they increase or decrease, the patch will also do the Right Thing, AFAICS. Increasing hw limits will not automatically increase the sw limit, but IMO that's actually expected. Best Regards, Martin -- Dr. Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>, Tel. +49 (0)911 74053 2107 SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
