On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 10:16:34AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > Hi Ming, > > On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 01:27:23AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > > - blk_mq_run_hw_queues(q, false); > > + if (q->mq_ops) > > + blk_mq_run_hw_queues(q, false); > > What speaks against putting the if (q->mq_ops) directly into > blk_mq_run_hw_queues() so we can't accidently call it from the sq path? > > Just an idea, no hard preferences here. Given it is the only case that blk_mq_run_hw_queues() is run on !q->mq_ops now, I suggest to check q->mq_ops outside, otherwise it can be a bit overkill. -- Ming
