2017-08-30 18:55 GMT+02:00 Viswas G <viswas.g@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Hi Jack, > > This is a customer requirement. Since the SAS addresses of all the phys were same , when the attached SAS addresses are different, it was forming only one domain. If we assign different SAS addresses, this will cause duplicate domain unless we set the strict_wide_port to 1. > > Regards, > Viswas G Ok, understand now! Acked-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks! > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jack Wang [mailto:xjtuwjp@xxxxxxxxx] >> Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 4:55 PM >> To: Viswas G <viswas.g@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Vasanthalakshmi Tharmarajan >> <vasanthalakshmi.thar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] pm80xx : Different SAS addresses for phys. >> >> EXTERNAL EMAIL >> >> >> 2015-01-30 7:06 GMT+01:00 Viswas G <Viswas.G@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> > Different SAS addresses are assigned for each set of phys. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Viswas G <Viswas.G@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > --- >> > drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c | 13 +++++++++---- >> > drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c | 3 +-- >> > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c >> b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c >> > index 034b2f7d1135..d282f1562615 100644 >> > --- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c >> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c >> > @@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ static void pm8001_phy_init(struct >> pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha, int phy_id) >> > sas_phy->oob_mode = OOB_NOT_CONNECTED; >> > sas_phy->linkrate = SAS_LINK_RATE_UNKNOWN; >> > sas_phy->id = phy_id; >> > - sas_phy->sas_addr = &pm8001_ha->sas_addr[0]; >> > + sas_phy->sas_addr = (u8 *)&phy->dev_sas_addr; >> > sas_phy->frame_rcvd = &phy->frame_rcvd[0]; >> > sas_phy->ha = (struct sas_ha_struct *)pm8001_ha->shost->hostdata; >> > sas_phy->lldd_phy = phy; >> > @@ -593,10 +593,12 @@ static void pm8001_post_sas_ha_init(struct >> Scsi_Host *shost, >> > for (i = 0; i < chip_info->n_phy; i++) { >> > sha->sas_phy[i] = &pm8001_ha->phy[i].sas_phy; >> > sha->sas_port[i] = &pm8001_ha->port[i].sas_port; >> > + sha->sas_phy[i]->sas_addr = >> > + (u8 *)&pm8001_ha->phy[i].dev_sas_addr; >> > } >> > sha->sas_ha_name = DRV_NAME; >> > sha->dev = pm8001_ha->dev; >> > - >> > + sha->strict_wide_ports = 1; >> > sha->lldd_module = THIS_MODULE; >> > sha->sas_addr = &pm8001_ha->sas_addr[0]; >> > sha->num_phys = chip_info->n_phy; >> > @@ -613,6 +615,7 @@ static void pm8001_post_sas_ha_init(struct >> Scsi_Host *shost, >> > static void pm8001_init_sas_add(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha) >> > { >> > u8 i, j; >> > + u8 sas_add[8]; >> > #ifdef PM8001_READ_VPD >> > /* For new SPC controllers WWN is stored in flash vpd >> > * For SPC/SPCve controllers WWN is stored in EEPROM >> > @@ -674,10 +677,12 @@ static void pm8001_init_sas_add(struct >> pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha) >> > pm8001_ha->sas_addr[j] = >> > payload.func_specific[0x804 + i]; >> > } >> > - >> > + memcpy(sas_add, pm8001_ha->sas_addr, SAS_ADDR_SIZE); >> > for (i = 0; i < pm8001_ha->chip->n_phy; i++) { >> > + if (i && ((i % 4) == 0)) >> > + sas_add[7] = sas_add[7] + 4; >> > memcpy(&pm8001_ha->phy[i].dev_sas_addr, >> > - pm8001_ha->sas_addr, SAS_ADDR_SIZE); >> > + sas_add, SAS_ADDR_SIZE); >> > PM8001_INIT_DBG(pm8001_ha, >> > pm8001_printk("phy %d sas_addr = %016llx\n", i, >> > pm8001_ha->phy[i].dev_sas_addr)); >> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c >> b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c >> > index 8fb5ddf08cc4..a07b023c09bf 100644 >> > --- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c >> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c >> > @@ -3041,7 +3041,6 @@ hw_event_phy_down(struct pm8001_hba_info >> *pm8001_ha, void *piomb) >> > port->port_state = portstate; >> > phy->identify.device_type = 0; >> > phy->phy_attached = 0; >> > - memset(&phy->dev_sas_addr, 0, SAS_ADDR_SIZE); >> > switch (portstate) { >> > case PORT_VALID: >> > break; >> > @@ -4394,7 +4393,7 @@ pm80xx_chip_phy_start_req(struct >> pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha, u8 phy_id) >> > payload.sas_identify.dev_type = SAS_END_DEVICE; >> > payload.sas_identify.initiator_bits = SAS_PROTOCOL_ALL; >> > memcpy(payload.sas_identify.sas_addr, >> > - pm8001_ha->sas_addr, SAS_ADDR_SIZE); >> > + &pm8001_ha->phy[phy_id].dev_sas_addr, SAS_ADDR_SIZE); >> > payload.sas_identify.phy_id = phy_id; >> > ret = pm8001_mpi_build_cmd(pm8001_ha, circularQ, opcode, >> &payload, 0); >> > return ret; >> > -- >> > 2.12.3 >> > >> This removes the possibility to form a wide port, why do you want to do it?