Re: [PATCH 14/18] scsi: Make scsi_initialize_rq() zero the entire struct scsi_cmnd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2017-05-21 at 08:49 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 11:30:12AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > This simplifies the memset() call in scsi_initialize_rq() and avoids
> > that any stale data is left behind in struct scsi_request.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> > Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 6 ++----
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> > index eeb668935836..791bae192bfb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> > @@ -1160,11 +1160,9 @@ static void scsi_initialize_rq(struct request *rq)
> >  	void *buf = cmd->sense_buffer;
> >  	void *prot = cmd->prot_sdb;
> >  
> > -	/* zero out the cmd, except for the embedded scsi_request */
> > -	memset((char *)cmd + sizeof(cmd->req), 0,
> > -		sizeof(*cmd) - sizeof(cmd->req) + dev->host->hostt->cmd_size);
> > +	memset(cmd, 0, blk_queue_cmd_size(rq->q));
> >  	scsi_req_init(&cmd->req);
> > -	cmd->req.sense = cmd->sense_buffer;
> > +	cmd->req.sense = buf;
> >  	cmd->device = dev;
> >  	cmd->sense_buffer = buf;
> 
> maybe move the two sense buffer initializations together?

Hello Christoph,

That sounds like a good idea to me. I will make that change.

Bart.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux