Re: [PATCH v2] sd: Ignore sync cache failures when not supported

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christoph,

> Normally we'd just pass the scsi_sense_hdr structure in from the caler
> if we care about sense data.  Is this something you considered?
>
> Otherwise this looks fine to me.

I agree with Christoph that passing the sense header would be more
consistent with the rest of the SCSI code. Even if we only need the key
in this case.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux