Re: [RFC] scsi: reduce protection of scan_mutex in scsi_remove_device

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2017-04-21 at 14:13 -0700, Song Liu wrote:
> On the other hand, some devices do long latency IO during deletion,
> for example, sd_shutdown() may do sync cache and/or start_stop.
> It is not necessary for these commands to run in series.

Have you noticed my patch series that makes sd_shutdown() submit the
SYNCHRONIZE CACHE command asynchronously? Have you tried whether that
patch series would be a good alternative?

Thanks,

Bart.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux