On Sun, 2006-07-02 at 15:28 +0100, Grant Wilson wrote:
> With the patch applied to 2.6.17-mm5 my RAID-1 is up and running on both
> SATA drives with no problems.
That's great, thanks. Now we know what the problem patch is, I'd like
to try an 11th our correction of the logic fault in the original. Could
you try this patch against original -mm (by reversing the previous
patch). I think it should correct the problem?
Thanks,
James
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
index bf5191f..08af9aa 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
@@ -920,22 +920,20 @@ void scsi_io_completion(struct scsi_cmnd
* Next deal with any sectors which we were able to correctly
* handle.
*/
- if (good_bytes > 0) {
- SCSI_LOG_HLCOMPLETE(1, printk("%ld sectors total, "
- "%d bytes done.\n",
- req->nr_sectors, good_bytes));
- SCSI_LOG_HLCOMPLETE(1, printk("use_sg is %d\n", cmd->use_sg));
-
- if (clear_errors)
- req->errors = 0;
-
- /* A number of bytes were successfully read. If there
- * is leftovers and there is some kind of error
- * (result != 0), retry the rest.
- */
- if (scsi_end_request(cmd, 1, good_bytes, !!result) == NULL)
- return;
- }
+ SCSI_LOG_HLCOMPLETE(1, printk("%ld sectors total, "
+ "%d bytes done.\n",
+ req->nr_sectors, good_bytes));
+ SCSI_LOG_HLCOMPLETE(1, printk("use_sg is %d\n", cmd->use_sg));
+
+ if (clear_errors)
+ req->errors = 0;
+
+ /* A number of bytes were successfully read. If there
+ * are leftovers and there is some kind of error
+ * (result != 0), retry the rest.
+ */
+ if (scsi_end_request(cmd, 1, good_bytes, result == 0) == NULL)
+ return;
/* good_bytes = 0, or (inclusive) there were leftovers and
* result = 0, so scsi_end_request couldn't retry.
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
