Re: 2.6.17-mm5 dislikes raid-1, just like mm4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



James Bottomley wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-07-02 at 17:13 +1200, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
>> Just for kicks, after testing those two trees (see previous email) I
>> took my 
>> 2.6.17-mm5 without git-scsi-misc and then patched git-scsi-misc.patch
>> back in, 
>> rebuilt and rebooted and noted that RAID broke again.  Reverted the
>> patch and it 
>> all worked.
>>
>> So I can conclude that definitely and reproduceably that's the
>> one.........
> 
> OK, I have a theory.  I think 
> 
> [SCSI] sd/scsi_lib simplify sd_rw_intr and scsi_io_completion
> 
> Failed to take into account completion of zero length commands (which is
> what a flush is).  Could you try the whole of -mm with this patch?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> James
> 
[patch snipped]

With the patch applied to 2.6.17-mm5 my RAID-1 is up and running on both
SATA drives with no problems.

Thanks,
Grant
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux