On Tue, 2017-04-04 at 19:35 -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> index fb9b4d29af0b..6084c415c070 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> @@ -2102,6 +2102,16 @@ static void read_capacity_error(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct scsi_device *sdp,
>
> #define READ_CAPACITY_RETRIES_ON_RESET 10
>
> +static bool sd_addressable_capacity(u64 lba, unsigned int sector_size)
> +{
> + u64 last_sector = lba + 1ULL << ilog2(sector_size) - 9;
> +
> + if (sizeof(sector_t) == 4 && last_sector > 0xffffffffULL)
> + return false;
> +
> + return true;
> +}
Hello Martin,
How about replacing 0xffffffffULL with U32_MAX, adding parentheses in the
last_sector computation to make clear that + and - have precedence over <<
and adding a comment above sd_addressable_capacity() that explains its
purpose and also that the shift operation must not be replaced with a call
to logical_to_sectors()? Otherwise this patch looks fine to me.
Thanks,
Bart.
