On 2017-03-21 05:19, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
There are same conditions for checking whether supporting clkscaling or
not.
When ufshcd is supporting clkscaling, active_reqs should be decreased
by
two.
Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index dc6efbd..f2cbc71 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -4598,8 +4598,6 @@ static void __ufshcd_transfer_req_compl(struct
ufs_hba *hba,
}
if (ufshcd_is_clkscaling_supported(hba))
hba->clk_scaling.active_reqs--;
- if (ufshcd_is_clkscaling_supported(hba))
- hba->clk_scaling.active_reqs--;
}
/* clear corresponding bits of completed commands */
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
