Hi, On Tuesday, March 21, 2017 09:19:57 PM Jaehoon Chung wrote: > There are same conditions for checking whether supporting clkscaling or > not. > When ufshcd is supporting clkscaling, active_reqs should be decreased by > two. I guess you meant "one" here, not "two"? > Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > index dc6efbd..f2cbc71 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > @@ -4598,8 +4598,6 @@ static void __ufshcd_transfer_req_compl(struct ufs_hba *hba, > } > if (ufshcd_is_clkscaling_supported(hba)) > hba->clk_scaling.active_reqs--; > - if (ufshcd_is_clkscaling_supported(hba)) > - hba->clk_scaling.active_reqs--; > } > > /* clear corresponding bits of completed commands */ Best regards, -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics
