Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning, version 9

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 02:59:11PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> 
> > Fortunately, USB is SCSI, so we can actually use this code to solve that
> > problem too.  I wasn't thinking of USB when I wrote the code (because I
> > didn't know there was a problem).  But really, it's very generic stuff;
> > there's a list_head, a pointer to a Scsi_Host and a completion.
> > 
> > I'm not 100% sure what the problem is with USB. 
> 
> I seem to remember that the problem with USB was that you can't even
> know how many things are still outstanding; devices are free to appear
> on the bus at any time after bus power on, without specified timeout...
> If the kernel can't know what's out there, it can't wait until it has a
> complete picture either, just by virtue of not being able to know when
> that is achieved ;-)

This is true.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux