Re: [PATCH] scsi: megaraid_sas: handle dma_addr_t right on 32-bit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: megaraid_sas: handle dma_addr_t right on 32-bit
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 21:40:15 -0500
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>, Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Shivasharan S <shivasharan.srikanteshwara@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tomas Henzl <thenzl@xxxxxxxxxx>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxxx>, Sasikumar Chandrasekaran <sasikumar.pc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, megaraidlinux.pdl@xxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20170214212238.2696334-1-arnd@arndb.de> (Arnd Bergmann's message of "Tue, 14 Feb 2017 22:21:51 +0100")
Organization: Oracle Corporation
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux)

>>>>> "Arnd" == Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> writes:

Arnd> When building with a dma_addr_t that is different from pointer
Arnd> size, we get this warning:

Applied to 4.11/scsi-queue.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- [PATCH] scsi: megaraid_sas: handle dma_addr_t right on 32-bit
  - From: Arnd Bergmann

Prev by Date: Re: [patch] scsi: megaraid_sas: array overflow in megasas_dump_frame()
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v4] sd: Check for unaligned partial completion
Previous by thread: RE: [PATCH] scsi: megaraid_sas: handle dma_addr_t right on 32-bit
Next by thread: [PATCH v4] sd: Check for unaligned partial completion
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [SCSI Target Devel] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Linux IIO] [Samba] [Device Mapper]