Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] blk-trace update vs API stability

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx> writes:

> At LSF I'd like to discuss
> - Do we consider blktrace (and any other tracepoint in eg SCSI) as a
> stable API?

I don't have a strong opinion on this.

> - How do we go about modifying blktrace?

Blktrace has a version number associated with trace events.  Bump the
version for non-backward-compatible changes.

> - Is this even desired?

Yes.

Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux