On Fri, 9 Jun 2006, Lev A. Melnikovsky wrote: > operation. A funny artifact though can be seen at the picture (this is a > ~800KB map of Japan http://kapitza.ras.ru/~leva/Japan.jpg ). It looks like > during each reselect a chunk of data is lost (or maybe transferred twice?) and > the data stream gets an offset. My understanding is that the scan data are > 8bits per color component which gives 24bits/pixel. Lev, an easier possibility to test if bytes are lost or repeated: just scan an image several times, saving it in an UNcompressed format, then, I think, the size should always be the same, right? Then you can just compare which file is bigger - the correct or the damaged one. Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
