Hi Martin, On 12/9/16, 11:39 AM, "Madhani, Himanshu" <Himanshu.Madhani@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >On 12/9/16, 5:10 AM, "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>Ok. We'll still need to use PCI_IRQ_AFFINITY here after it's removed >>i nthe previous patch, but with pci_irq_alloc_vectors_affinity so that >>we can get the separate non-assignment vector right as in the previous >>discussion. > >Ack. Will fix up patch and resend series. Would you be pulling changes for this new call into scsi tree anytime soon https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git/log/?h=irq/for-block > >Thanks, >- Himanshu > > ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{������ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
