Hello, Rameshwar.
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 01:36:28PM +0530, Rameshwar Sahu wrote:
> Hi Tejun,
>
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 10:15 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 04:15:00PM +0530, Rameshwar Sahu wrote:
> >> > @@ -821,8 +823,6 @@ static int xgene_ahci_probe(struct platform_device
> >> > *pdev)
> >> > dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "%s: Error reading
> >> > device info. Assume version1\n",
> >> > __func__);
> >> > version = XGENE_AHCI_V1;
> >> > - } else if (info->valid & ACPI_VALID_CID) {
> >> > - version = XGENE_AHCI_V2;
> >
> > Can you please explain this part a bit? Everything else looks good to
> > me.
>
> Here we should not assume XGENE_AHCI_V2 always in case of having valid
> _CID in ACPI table.
> I need to remove this assumption because V1_1 has also valid _CID for
> backward compatibly with v1.
Can you please repost with the above explanation added to the commit
message?
Thanks!
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
