Re: [PATCH] scsi: Return -EINVAL when "id == max_id" in scsi_scan_host_selected()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2006-05-20 at 12:41 -0700, Amit Arora wrote:
> Thus, I still think applying the patch might be a good idea in the
> immediate future. Moreover, this patch doesn't change the current
> definition of any of these variables and results in a behavior which
> is
> currently expected. So, till the time we figure out what should be
> done
> in the long run to remove any confusion over the definition of these
> variables - why not apply the patch ?

Actually, we've got another cockup here with drivers: some have set this
to 8 or 16 and others to 7 or 15.  If we apply this without auditing
them, for those who set it to 7 or 15, the last target will end up
inaccessible.

James


-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux