Re: [Fwd: [RFT] major libata update]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 19:39 -0700, Luben Tuikov wrote:
> Apparently you have no detailed knowlege of the implementation of
> SCSI storage stacks, for example: driver->fw->interconnect->device.

Well, I'm sure I read about it in a comic book somewhere ...

> You also fail to understand who the "I" and "T" could be in an
> I_T_x_x nexus at each stage of an implementation.
> 
> You also fail to understand that a SAM nexus is not necessarily
> established
> when queuecommand() is called. 

I didn't say it was.  The point, which you're ignoring, is that when the
driver knows the SAM nexus is terminated, it should call ->done() ASAP
to inform the mid-layer of this condition, so the mid-layer model of the
device interactions follows the SAM interactions as closely as possible.
The API you want to introduce and the implementation of it in libata lie
to the mid-layer and pretend the nexus still exists when the driver
knows it doesn't ... what I'm saying is that I see no reason to do that.

James


-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux