James Smart wrote: > Good Catch! > > -- james s > > Andrew Vasquez wrote: >> Current fc_transport consumers initially register rports >> with an UNKNOWN role-state and follow-up with a call to >> fc_remote_port_rolechg(). So, is the above sequence necessary? Why not just register the rport with appropriate role and state? This is what LSI fusion driver (mptfc) does. "roles" has target and initiator set. (Is fusion broken?) (Not saying the fix shouldn't be there.) Mike <...snip...> - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
