[Moved to linux-scsi] On Mon, 9 Jan 2006, Matthew Dharm wrote: > A long time ago, I noticed a quirk of the UFI specification in regards to > one of the options for how to indicate a LUN isn't there. Something about > a special PDT, I think, in the INQUIRY respose. I don't recall the > details, but I do recall thinking something along the lines of "that's > odd.. and it's going to confuse the SCSI core." > > If I can find some time to search for that oddity of spec, then modify the > UFI protocol handler to translate that oddity into a result code the SCSI > core can understand, you can close the #2 case. I see what you mean. The UFI spec requires a device to return 0x1f in the first byte of the INQUIRY response if no device is present at the LUN. That's Peripheral Qualifier = 0 and PDT = 0x1f (unknown or no device). Now SCSI-2 requires the value to be 0x7f to indicate no device, but UFI also requires the returned SCSI level to be 0, and I don't know what SCSI-0 says about reporting no device at a LUN. Does anybody among the SCSI developers have the answer? Should scsi_probe_and_add_lun() check for (result[0] & 0x1f) == 0x1f whenever (result[2] & 0x07) == 0? If not, perhaps usb-storage should alter the returned value and max_lun for a UFI device whenever we see 0x1f. Alan Stern - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
