Re: [PATCH 2.4 2/2] cpqfc: Reduce stack usage of 2 functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 01:05:37PM +0100, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
>> There are 2 function that do a lookup to the queue and buffer the result.
>> They only care about the first few bytes (to be exactly: 38*sizeof(u32)),
>> but they always pass a buffer of 2kB, which is located on the stack.
>>
>> This patch reduces this buffer to the really needed size and changes it's
>> type to the correct target type. The rest of the queue is still looked up
>> but the result is ignored (as it would anyway).
>>
>> There are also some small cleanups for the other arguments of
>> CpqTsGetSFQEntry(), which is the lookup function.

>Is there an evidence that the gratuitous stack usage is causing problems
> with an 8kB stack?
>
>In other ways, this looks more like an optimization than a serious bugfix?

I have no reports of this, but this proves nothing. But why waste one quarter 
of the stack for nothing?

Eike

Attachment: pgpO92uLEFCyU.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux