On Iau, 2005-12-08 at 14:18 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote: > drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c), with struct device.firmware_data being where > the acpi_handle ends up. I guess there's no problem in moving my code > out to scsi-acpi.c and adding an arch_initcall for it. Would that be > more acceptable? The only problem then is working out a clean way of > setting up the notification structure. I would say your code belongs in the ACPI subtree. At most the core code wants to have the generic supporting functions for 'do a taskfile' and if need be to call an arch/platform resume function that any pm system can sensibly use. SCSI should not know detail about ACPI, APM or anything of that nature. Alan - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
