Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 09:15:42AM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> NACK.  ACPI-specific hacks do not have any business at all in the scsi layer.

Ok. What's the right layer to do this? The current ACPI/anything else 
glue depends on specific knowledge about the bus concerned, and needs 
callbacks registered before devices are added to that bus. Doing it in 
the sata layer would have the potential for unhappiness on mixed 
sata/scsi machines.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux