Re: [DOC PATCH] T10/04-262r8

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 07:19 +0100, thomas schorpp wrote:
> how about full definitions of the pasthru cdb's in kernel structs and approbiate ioctls?

Why would we want to do that?  The whole point about pass through is
that it is designed to use the existing SCSI infrastructure
transparently (hence use SG_IO to send an ATA command to a bridge that
understands it---but the key point here is that the device so addressed
must understand the opcodes).

> the passthru cdb is also not clear enough to me:
> according to sat-r06 spec byte 0-2 is scsi, 3-9 are ata, 11 is scsi, yes?

Actually, no; byte 0 is the opcode, so you could call that SCSI and byte
11 (or 15) is the control as defined by SAM; the rest all contain SAT
specific fields.

James


-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux