RE: [2.4.21] Spurious ABORTs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 13:10 -0400, Bagalkote, Sreenivas wrote:
> What do you mean by "actually do a reset"? I see that firmware doesn't
> have any pending commands. So I simply return success from reset routine.
> Do you see any problem in this? After a hundred or so such cycles, the 
> system is frozen. I should also tell you that if I introduce abort handler
> and return success for all the completed commands, I don't see the OS hang.

Well, yes, for two reasons

1. you do clustering, so a reset request could be from a reservation
breaking protocol

2. The fact that the eh activated indicates something went wrong.  If
you take no corrective action and the test unit ready that follows the
reset fails or times out then the device will be taken offline.

James


-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux