On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 13:00 -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, James Bottomley wrote: > > > On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 16:49 -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > > This hasn't been tested very thoroughly, so please look through it > > > carefully. > > > > Actually, just one problem and one cosmetic fix: > > > > 1) We need to dequeue for the loop and kill case (it seems easiest > > simply to dequeue in the scsi_kill_request() routine) > > 2) There's no real need to drop the queue lock. __scsi_done() is lock > > agnostic, so since there's no requirement, let's just leave it in to > > avoid any locking issues. > > Have you applied this to any publicly-accessible tree yet? I looked at > the git browsers on parisc-linux.org and kernel.org, but the patch doesn't > seem to be there yet. Yes, they should both be in 2.6.14-rc1 > For that matter, what about the other patches you agreed to take (as543 - > as546)? They aren't in the git repositories either. It would be good if > all these things could be ready in time for the next -mm release. That I think was these [from the latest GIT PATCH email]: > Alan Stern: > o Fix module removal/device add race > o fix callers of scsi_remove_device() who already hold the scan > muted > o add missing scan mutex to scsi_scan_target() James - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
